Windscribe

Site Development Tool Suggestions
31

I think that you and @Anon47486929 are simply focused on and referring to different (somewhat conflicting) statements made by Windscribe. I believe this comment (made in reference to the 2022 audit) is what @Anon47486929 is referring to:

(src)

1 Like
33

I think a summary that would be agreeable to all would be be:

  1. There was a 2022 audit, but that audit was done on an earlier stack that didn’t make it to production.

  2. There is a 2024 audit, that was done on the stack that is being rolled out in production currently, but that rollout is not yet complete, so some of the current infrastructure remains un-audited.

  3. Once the ‘freshscribe’ rollout is complete, the 2024 audit will be relevant and apply to the stack being used in production.

8 Likes
34

You nicely corrected my post that tried to summarize.

That’s wrong. Like you said, it did not make it to production at all. They modified the new infrastructure they were building and it’s this one (the one that was audited by PacketLabs) that was running in production for “a selected group of beta testers”.

1 Like
35

This may be the first time in the history of the internet that not one, not two, not three but four of us separately acknowledged being wrong about something we said or thought in a single thread. :tada: :champagne: it’s quite refreshing.

6 Likes
36

frame this moment ya’ll

1 Like
37

Screenshot_20241118-112353
Screenshot_20241118-1123531080×630 61.1 KB

I don’t think Windscribe is worth recommending at the moment. The company thinks they can get away with anything with their oh-so-funny attitude.

38

I’ll add this link to the relevant topic about their bad-faith marketing.

3 Likes