Proton seems to be working on its own web browser

1 Like

Not sure why that link is showing like that. Anyway, Proton is developing a new web browser. That’s what this is about

1 Like

Bloody hell, Proton’s absolutely determined to get a foothold wherever it can – the new, premium, pay-to-use Google. It’s truly pathetic.

We’ve already got Firefox, Brave, Tor, Mullvad and, soon, Ladybird, but I suppose that’s still not enough – just like with Proton Chat, where we’ve already got Signal and SimpleX, but even that isn’t enough.

Proton is sickening and has become exactly what it set out to fight against: locking its users into its own ecosystems (for a fee, of course).

5 Likes

the new, premium, pay-to-use Google. It’s truly pathetic.

you want privacy? pay. Also Proton offers a totally free tier so… not really accurate

Proton is sickening and has become exactly what it set out to fight against: locking its users into its own ecosystems (for a fee, of course).

Lol. They are building an ecosystem but you can always easily migrate away if you want (except SL because of the nature of email). And also no one’s forcing you to use all of Proton’s services. You can just use Mail or Pass for example and nothing else.

Now as to the news itself. Why is Proton doing this?? Like others have said there is already Ladybird in the works and Proton even sponsored them.

5 Likes

Always nice to have more options.

However it would be nice if they focused a bit more on fixing what they’ve already got instead of the constant stream of new products. There are so many improvements that could be made to Mail/Simple Login, VPN clients, Drive, Calendar, etc.

15 Likes

I’m not entirely sure why either. Honstly, it seems kinda pointless to me considering we’ve already got so many browsers and I’m sure Protons isn’t going to be much different than some of the others.

I know Proton is supposed to be a privacy focused company, but the only reason I can think of for creating another browser is to collect the data from it. I don’t know that however, and maybe someone knows something I don’t.

1 Like

Even when disagreeing, be agreeable. Don’t call names. This isn’t reddit.

15 Likes

I don’t see the point in Proton having their own browser. Especially if there is no profit motive for them. I cannot see myself paying for a browser. Even if their browser is 100% free, I’m not sure if this is the best place to spend their resources. I don’t want my Proton account to be linked to my Proton browser activity. I also think it will be very telling if they opt for Chromium vs. Firefox.

2 Likes

So you just don’t like having too many options?

I get being annoyed that Proton seemingly cant stay focused on one product for very long but it also seems like your issue is that you don’t want more then like 4 options.

This has been there business model for a looong time. That is the whole point of forcing people buy bundles and incentivizing using multiple products by making it cheaper then using one.

1 Like

So you just don’t like having too many options?

I get being annoyed that Proton seemingly cant stay focused on one product for very long but it also seems like your issue is that you don’t want more then like 4 options.

We already have a choice; we already have a whole host of browsers and two very good messaging apps. What Proton is doing is further fragmenting the user base.

Firefox is struggling, Brave has a solid user base, I think, and Ladybird still needs to win people over; Proton won’t bring anything to the table apart from even more fragmentation.
The same goes for Proton Chat: we already have Signal and SimpleX, which are struggling against competition from WhatsApp and Telegram; Proton will divide users even further.

Having more choice isn’t necessarily a good thing; services that are already well-established risk suffering as a result.
And just as before, Proton is now an ecosystem that will claim victims.

I sincerely hope that Proton Browser and Chat will fail.

4 Likes

The browser ecosystem is a little crowded, sure. But there are gaps in the market that could be improved upon.

Id like to see an anonymity browser like Tor Browser that isn’t built on gecko, for example. And Brave, while a decent anti-fingerprint browser, does have its fair share of issues - I would consider replacing it, should another strong option emerge

Whether Proton will actually build a tool that closes one such gap is another question. I dont have any interest in a whitelabelled Mulvad Browser remix

5 Likes

I don’t think browsers are fragmented in the same way messaging apps are. They’re completely different scenarios. Using Proton Browser doesn’t prevent anyone from interacting with Firefox, Brave, or Ladybird users because they all access the same web. Not counting hobby project forks, because everyone and their cow seems to be making one, but actual viable competition is a great thing. Proton is a juggernaut that can bring that. I for one certainly don’t want my choice between Brave or Firefox. Ladybird being a completely new engine, it is definitely going to need to mature for my taste even when it’s released.

And realistically, how many browsers are even recommended here? Excluding Tor, it’s what, two or three? On Android, it’s practically down to one I think at this point. Firefox struggling is not an argument against new competition, I promise you, they’re shooting themselves in the foot perfectly on their own without new competition. Proton doesn’t need to replace Firefox or Ladybird to justify its existence. It only needs to offer privacy, integration, ad blocking, and convenience that some people prefer.

And what exactly is wrong with an ecosystem? Ecosystems are not inherently bad. The problems come when companies create hardware lock in, or make leaving difficult, or when users fail to keep independent backups and give themselves no 3-2-1 backup practical way out. Proton offering interoperable services is not automatically comparable to Apple locking hardware, software, purchases, and accessories together.

Hoping a product fails before it even has the chance to compete is a strange position. Seem unreasonably angry about this for some reason. Let it launch, judge what it actually offers, and let people decide whether it deserves to succeed.

4 Likes

Your prefrence is everyone is centralized into one or two browser and chat options?

How do you know? All the options we currently have are flawed. No harm in Proton throwing its hat into the ring.

Fair, although I think having less choice is far more likely to be a bad thing.

The Proton browser makes sense, especially from an organizational or business perspective, which is effectively dominated by Edge and Chrome.

It’s unfortunate that proton is creating yet another extremly big time sink instead of improving their current product. This new bottomless time sink is never going to be filled, when compared with the competition that have much more ressources and are dedicated to a browser. I’m unlikely to swap out my Vivaldi browser with the new kid on the block with no customization and an unsure future of yet another sideline project.

The placement of their offering could be useful, i.e. a remplacement for brave (which I dont trust the parent company), with anti-fingerprint capability, but how much time will this take while they could have improved simplelogin, mail, drive, drive for photo, linux client for vpn, dedicated contact app, contact sync on android, simplelogin integration into mail they never materialized? This is so unfortunate.

7 Likes
off topic: limited resources

There’s a persistent narrative that claims Proton’s new product offerings detract from efforts to improve existing products. Where is this coming from?

Proton is a very large company, with lots of money and resources. I’ve seen no evidence to suggest slow development on existing tools is the result of limited resources being allocated towards different projects. I’ve been working under the assumption that the improvements they ā€˜fail’ to add to existing tools just isn’t important to their business strategy

I do believe that ā€˜new tool = old tools are improved at a slower rate’ is a logical fallacy. I expect each project hires different devs, thus development on existing tools would proceed at the same pace regardless. I’ve no reason to believe a new browser project would impact the dev schedule on other tools

1 Like

This is key. An ecosystem may or may not be good for individuals (I personally don’t mind it). But a small business or organization needs a ā€œsolutionā€. Proton continues to build a solution that is attractive to organizations who want a stable, predictable, and private communication infrastructure. This is a win for Proton, for privacy, and for individuals. Privacy needs to be normalized. Right now the privacy web browser market is competing for the small group of privacy-loving outliers. The Proton ecosystem, while relevant to individuals, is going straight at Google/Microsoft. A browser from Proton seems like a no-brainer. My humble opinion.

2 Likes

I think what everyone is missing here is exposure. There are so many tools out there that nobody ever uses. If you want to grab the attention of the masses, you need to stand out and provide value where it’s understandable. Normal users really can’t understand the differences between all the browsers now. If you give them 1 whole package, it is very easy to communicate the product. This is why Apple/Microsoft are so successful, they communicate understandable solutions. If you want to compete you have to follow the same strategy. Proton luckily is trying to protect users.

there is no time to wait, you have to get in the market as fast as possible, you can fix the problem things later on. Proton is using the same strategy as MS/Apple but honestly it’s the only way to be successful.

2 Likes

I am not against Proton launching new products and services. I just don’t think this is the kind of new project that should be a priority. I would rather Proton develop a private eBook (EPUB) reader with great UI and UX rivalling Apple Books and Google Playbooks. That’s something I would use.

I would also be happier if they developed private medical software to handle patient data, even if it’s for the exclusive use of healthcare providers, of which there are many.

With that said, there is still a lot of improvement to be done on Proton’s current services. I would like to see upload links in Proton Drive, so I can invite others to securely upload files in my account in a dedicated folder. I would also like to see better support for anonymous payments.

1 Like

Can’t wait for ProtonLinux and ProtonCoin. Maybe a music app too?

1 Like