-
I assume this relates to our website? If so, its 1st party tracking and its blocked by our browser extensions and when you sue ROBERT, but default. Details on what is “tracked” is in our privacy policy.
-
I’m not sure why the dev said that in the Android repo, support will be the same and identical in all apps. Reply updated.
-
Yes, they all do.
-
Audits are in the relevant project repos. We have another round scheduled in early 2025 after all the FreshScribe features are added to the clients.
Yes. As I said previously, it would be nice if you put the list of key executives, and if possible your employees directly on your website. It is was reported that the list is available on internet, but having the list on your website would be an additional token of confidence.
He already replied to this.
Yes, this is still true, and it’s impossible to do it any other way because…computers.
If you have a unique anything (IP, port) that is only used by a single person, then there is a record somewhere. This record can exist on a single server, as a route or iptables entry in memory, or in a central database. It makes no difference as far as subpoenas are concerned.
Anyone who will tell you otherwise doesn’t know what they’re talking about, or lying.
Ok sorry I didn’t see it.
may be relevant for you @anon29374801 Port Forwarding, Static IPs and Lies
Thanks! This is super useful. I think what confused me and what confused the original Reddit poster was conflating statics IPs with dedicated IPs. It looks like Windscribe assigns a static IP to a small group (less then 10 according to the article).
My understanding is that this makes the “paper trail” of the user traffic from that static IP a bit less concerning since they may have logs of which users were assigned to that IP but would not be able to sort which person did what on that assigned IP out of the group. @yegor feel free to correct me if I misunderstood.
Hi, I am a bit impatient but how are you doing on the roll-out of your new stack called Freshscribe, and the audits ? I ask here because I don’t have Discord sorry.
The feature is now avalaible on macOS too. since v2.14.10
As for Windscribe, what’s preventing them from being recommended by Privacy Guides?
Why should I consider Windscribe over Proton VPN when it comes to streaming? I mainly use services like YouTube TV, Hulu, Netflix, and the BBC iPlayer.
WS seems to get less blocked by streaming services, except for Disney. They are blocking everything
Just a heads up if anyone was waiting for one of their cheap deals to try them out. There’s a “$39 yearly subscription sale” which has just gone live for Windscribe Pro. It’s a recurring offer, $39 every 12 months, unless you cancel it.
I’m not getting a referral fee for this, just passing it on in case anyone wants to take advantage of it! ![]()
More info HERE
Thanks for the heads up. I was only looking for deals on them yesterday.
I think it might be their new price for deals. People were saying on the subreddit that they were going to have fewer sales in future and they seem to be tightening up on people taking the p1ss with their ‘unlimited device’ torrenting etc. Maybe the VPN market is becoming more competitive lately?
How long is this going to be offered? I still have 3 months on Mullvad but this is tempting!
Thought I would take them up on their 3 months offer together with addy.io, but then noticed they host their “jobs” section on x.com. ![]()
To recruit staff, you should of course post on mainstream websites. If you create an onion site using the Tor browser, will anyone see it? ![]()
So Proton works with Disney and WS doesn’t? Or both don’t work with Disney? WS has static residential IP’s at an additional cost, would that work?
Additional cost is 96 USD for residential IP. Proton Unlimited costs less. I have a long time discount from WS, paying only 19 USD per year. I have no intention to pay 96 USD for additional IP.