-
I assume this relates to our website? If so, its 1st party tracking and its blocked by our browser extensions and when you sue ROBERT, but default. Details on what is “tracked” is in our privacy policy.
-
I’m not sure why the dev said that in the Android repo, support will be the same and identical in all apps. Reply updated.
-
Yes, they all do.
-
Audits are in the relevant project repos. We have another round scheduled in early 2025 after all the FreshScribe features are added to the clients.
Yes. As I said previously, it would be nice if you put the list of key executives, and if possible your employees directly on your website. It is was reported that the list is available on internet, but having the list on your website would be an additional token of confidence.
He already replied to this.
Yes, this is still true, and it’s impossible to do it any other way because…computers.
If you have a unique anything (IP, port) that is only used by a single person, then there is a record somewhere. This record can exist on a single server, as a route or iptables entry in memory, or in a central database. It makes no difference as far as subpoenas are concerned.
Anyone who will tell you otherwise doesn’t know what they’re talking about, or lying.
Ok sorry I didn’t see it.
may be relevant for you @Parish2555 https://windscribe.com/blog/port-forwarding-static-ips-and-lies-bcf427fdb283/
Thanks! This is super useful. I think what confused me and what confused the original Reddit poster was probably conflating statics IPs with dedicated IPs. It looks like Windscribe assigns a static IP to a small group (less then 10 according to the article).
My understanding is that this makes the “paper trail” of the user traffic from that static IP a bit less concerning since they may have logs of which users were assigned to that IP but would not be able to sort which person did what on that assigned IP out of the group. @yegor feel free to correct me if I misunderstood.