No Right to Remain Silent: Negative Rights in a Positive-Rights World

Last December, reports began to circulate about the US Government’s proposed new entry requirements for tourists. Travelers may soon be asked to list and make public the social media accounts they’ve held over the last five years, and much more beyond that.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://www.privacyguides.org/posts/2026/06/01/no-right-to-remain-silent-negative-rights-in-a-positive-rights-world/
2 Likes

Laws around the globe focus on positive rights, or control over existing data. You can often request access, correction, deletion, or raise an objection through regulations such as the GDPR or CCPA. Practically none give you the reverse, negative rights.

In other words: the right to produce no data broadly doesn’t exist.

This is fantastically well-said and is something that I think doesn’t get talked about enough in discussions about privacy in general.

A system like the one we are currently building creates an environment where even the few protections the law does give in regards to privacy no longer matter. You may have rights regarding the use of your data, or to not participate in specific aspects of society, or to choose not to have a social media presence, but what can any of these rights do if the world we build makes it impossible to participate in without giving up said rights? That is not freedom. You may technically have all of these rights but by proxy you actually don’t.

The world has been shifting in this direction for a long time but what we see happening right now I feel is a very massive, very calculated shift to a world where proprietary ecosystems are the norm, where everything is locked down and controlled. That is not a world that I want to live in, and we need to be speaking up about it.

4 Likes

I haven’t had a social media account since 2010 - what are they going to do?

Luckily, I’ve already been to the US in 2016 and have no intentions of ever returning.

2 Likes