Yeah, lol. That is exactly what I was referring to. That entire situation snowballed into an avalanche of misinformation. Poor Andy just did a fundamentally bad job at communicating his core point, and thanks to the internet’s love for hyperbole, that misstep is probably going to haunt Proton for the rest of their existence.
Speaking of the intersection of misinformation and morality, I’ve used Brave as one of my browsers, and I’m definitely not thrilled about it. People are accusing me of supporting someone on a personal level (the CEO) and being transphobic. Meanwhile, the people who are telling me this, are literally telling me this over X. (yes I’m sure the hypocrisy and irony is lost on them)
It shows how difficult it is to find a project, franchise, or company head whose values actually align with your own. Mullvad makes a highly valid point that you shouldn’t judge an entire company and its services based on a single individual at the top. I think there’s a difference between a CEO making a stupid decision in his personal life, and a company on behalf of said company, actively funding hate group groups.
However, depending on your personal ethical boundaries, there are some depths you can refuse to plunge. If you reach that line and decide to walk away, I say go for it.
That being said, we really need to understand that a consumer using a product does not make them the scum of the Earth, and it definitely doesn’t make them equivalent to the bad actors running the company. Guilt by association is a flawed metric.
Obviously, there are varying degrees of severity, and the ethics are incredibly complicated. If your personal choice is to boycott, I fully support going for it, but we can’t aggressively judge others trying to shuffle around the same complex market. As the old saying goes, there’s really no ethical consumption under capitalism. Modern tech ecosystems sort of force us into using problematic products because monopolies, or lack of alternatives limit our choice choices.