Now I will reply to points you made in the other post here to continue it:
It makes perfect sense. It only doesn’t make sense if you are still thinking of Privacy Guides as a direct democracy, which again it certainly is not.
What I am saying is that what we are doing is considering how each and every decision we make will affect the many thousands of people who read our resources every day. This is precisely why we will occasionally make decisions that do not align with the very small minority of people here on the forum who are actively participating, because exactly like you said the community here on the forum alone is not the only audience we are writing for.
I am not suggesting we rope all of these people into a discussion, no.
You will have to elaborate on this, because this is the very first time I am hearing an objection to how we currently present Mull browser.
We reached a very solid compromise that most people could agree on with the “warnings” we added associated with the listing, which is exactly what achieving consensus is. The example you’re bringing up is probably one of the best examples in my mind of Privacy Guides working exactly as intended.