Maybe I’m missing something, but CoMaps doesn’t appear to be meaningfully community-driven either, and just because you say it and put Co in your name doesn’t make it true[1]. Even if it does prove to be true (which requires a track record), I fail to see what bearing that has on whether CoMaps should replace Organic Maps. For now, both apps have feature parity, making the biggest and most important differentiator Organic Maps’ maturity and track record as a project.
CoMaps also isn’t on Accrescent which is a direct and significant downgrade from Organic Maps and makes it a non-starter for me.
So far, the only demonstration of being community-driven was the vote for the logo and name. That said, public voting on such trivial things has zero bearing on whether a project is community-driven. That’s without getting into the fact that “the community was not included or even aware” given that it happened so soon after Co-Maps was announced, long before any significant portion of the community was aware of its existence. ↩︎