Best standard email (IMAP/SMTP) provider that is not terrible for privacy?

I have been struggling with ProtonMail in various ways for a while now due to some technical issues regarding lost email, unsent drafts, etc. I do not have a very severe threat model- I moved to Proton a while back just to get away from big tech tracking. I have discovered however, that I really would like to use a standard email client on my desktop and store my email locally. This is not possible without paying for the Proton bridge and, at this time, I’m not in a position to pay for email. So given that, if I were to move to a standard-type of free email account, what would be the best choice? Obviously, there’s Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, Yahoo, etc. and I know that they are all terrible in terms of privacy. Are there any others that I should consider? Thanks!

1 Like

Don’t most of these privacy focused providers not use IMAP/SMTP because they are terrible for privacy?

Could be wrong, but it seems like you have conflicting needs. You want a privacy focused email provider but you want to use non private protocols.

That’s more of a security thing. The privacy aspect that I’m concerned about is the scanning of emails to collect personal data. Google is the worst offender there. I understand that IMAP/SMTP is insecure but, in my case, I don’t have any contacts who use Proton, so my emails are already insecure given that recipients are still using these insecure protocols. So, for me, it’s not worth the headache of being stuck on a web client.

have you looked at the free tier for mailfence.com?

Free tier of mailfence doesn’t allow imap/smtp access like op wanted, only the paid entry 3.50/month plan allowed both.

Take a look at Fastmail.

No free tier available, just for your information.

1 Like

Thanks for the info. It looks like all the privacy-related email providers are putting IMAP/SMPT on their premium plans. What do you all think of iCloud mail?

Maybe some of the free European companies maybe? gmx perhaps?

Or mail.ee.

So given that, if I were to move to a standard-type of free email account, what would be the best choice?

Points made here are also worth taking into account: Remove Mailbox.org

It’s quite a shame that Proton Bridge is only available for paid users, it also doesn’t make any sense why that is the case (at least to me).

Yeah I missed that. I’m not familiar with “free” providers unfortunately.

For free account, theres cock.li that doesn’t require existing email address nor phone numbers, can even reg via tor and access imap via their onion domain but their collection of available domain for non tor is cringy except maybe 1-2, and judging by the banner at their site now they’re in some kind of trouble with the authorities. Obviously that fully anon type of service would attract some shady users.

Theres also disroot.org that also doesn’t require existing address nor phone number but they’re seems to be political activists leaning to the far left. They’re in the process of enabling encryption at rest with your own keys via lacre. I use them, actually like them and already donated. Since they’re donation based, its not as fast as your typical for profit service and there can be downtime here and there.

Mailbox and posteo aren’t that steep though for their lowest tier $1/month.

1 Like

You have the ones offering zero knowledge encryption:

  • Mailbox.org (paid)
  • Protonmail (IMAP is only for paid accounts and only works on desktop)

Then you have the ones that promise to respect your privacy, but can theoretically access your data. Both paid and free ones. Examples are Mailfence, Startmail, Posteo, Infomaniak, Kolab Now, Runbox, Murena, Cock.li, Disroot, and many more.

Then you have some that don’t need any personal data from you to register but are not necessarily “private” (might scan your emails and sell your info to advertisers).

Some good links for further research:

1 Like