Good morning –
After facing yet another email address change due to yet more issues at the most recent email service, I’m considering just going with self-hosted email to avoid repeatedly letting all my family and friends and needed contacts know about yet another address change. However, hosting email myself is well over my head technologically, so I’d have to use a service geared for that, and that seems like it can get into cost-prohibitive territory. I’ve seen email hosting services that charge $300USD a year, and that’s a lot for someone in my financial position, for simply hosting email.
I do already have an email account hosted by my website’s webhost. But I’m not sure how robust it is (or how sizable the storage, etc.), as it’s always just been a perk of having the website hosted anyway. I could port that to a self-hosted service, but read on to see why that may not be best.
With each new email service used, I’m having increasing issues with my email going into recipients’ spam folders, and if I just go with my current webhosted email address, reay [at] reayjespersen.com, I’m concerned the chances of getting relegated to spam will only increase due to what’s an admittedly weird combination of letters that may trigger spam filters.
And of course “reayjespersen” doesn’t suit the evergreen advice for an easily remembered or spelled URL anyway. I’ve had a lifetime of (understandable) misspellings of both of those names, so if I’m using that as a primary email account, there’s simply as a fact going to be more misspellings by more people having to make more corrections for emails they’re trying to send to me. And that doesn’t even get into me trying to spell all that out over the phone to people. Rife with potential mishearings. Ask me how I know.
Muddying the waters even further, when I pitched all this on Mastodon, someone chimed in saying he’d long hosted his own email but that he had another email address anyway for things like banking. He admitted he wasn’t totally sure how secure his self-hosting service was compared to a standalone email service, so he figured it’s better to be safe than sorry if/when his hosting service is hit by a bad actor. Which makes me wonder, if safest practice is to use a secondary address anyway for more sensitive matters, why am I bothering to self-host at all, rather than just making my primary address the (potentially) more secure option and using that as the default address for anything and everything?
Is there any insight on any issues mentioned above? The TL;DR summary:
- Is there anything a real person can do about avoiding email going into spam folders?
- Are more easily remembered/recognized real words less likely to go into spam folders (compared to reay.jespersen [at] protonmail.com , or reay [at] tuta.com or reay [at] posteo.com, all of which have sporadically gone into recipients’ spam folders)?
- Are third-party “self-hosted” services as secure as more common email services? Do you kinda get what you pay for, or is there a usual range for hosting costs that are all equally secure?
- Would/do you use your (third party) self-hosted email address for sensitive matters like banking, or do you have a more solid-seeming hosting option for that?
- Objectively and/or practically, would it behoove me for any/all of the above to look at getting a more easily remembered/typed URL and port my current home site over to that, then use that email address as my primary address indefinitely, to avoid repeatedly letting my entire contact list know about yet another email address change as yet another email service has disappointed me in some fundamental way? Or is that needlessly fussy for something with a more elegant option I haven’t considered yet?
Anything you can suggest or opine on would be much appreciated.