if my understanding is correct about how votes work, they are to gauge interest in the tool suggestion. inactive account votes skew that number.
For example the CoMaps suggestion (I am only using this as an example as its the first thread I saw today, no shade intended) has 8 inactive account votes, meaning over 20% of the votes for that topic are from users who have opted out of participating in this community.
an aside
honestly I think anon accounts in general shouldn’t be able to vote as there is already a loophole where users can double vote using an anon account and their regular accout, then let there anon account expire and vote again. I doubt this is truly being abused that much though.
From my understanding, the issue is not actually “inactive account” votes remaining, but rather votes of deleted/anonimized users remaining in the vote count.
I can see the argument that since this person behind this account has decided to fully leave the Privacy Guides community, or the account otherwise needed to be deleted, that removing suggestion votes made by that account may help to better reflect the true, current intent and desire of the community on a given topic/suggestion.
With all of that being said, I don’t currently see much issue with these “inactive account” votes remaining, as voting on a topic does not guarantee anything beyond the closer consideration of the issue by the Privacy Guides team.[1]
As far as I know, I may be wrong on this though. ↩︎