Good day,
I’m new to this forum, very interesting topics and discussions.
I became aware of the many ways our privacy is violated (after the local school system installed spyware on my personal laptop. Used my personal machine because they didn’t have enough devices and my kids needed to be kept up to speed)
Privacy violations include online, by apps, iPhones, Google Phones (GApps) or a computer OS (windows to me is a “boot sector virus”).
Landed on Linux, which can be somewhat straightforward, with VPN’s, browser isolation, etc.
And use a degoogled phone for personal purposes, my employer provides iPhones for business purposes.
Followed a number of privacy advocates online, but mostly Rob Braxman Tech (Rob Braxman Tech) a lot of his advice makes sense.
I’m trying to improve my knowledge of phone number isolation, Phone Number Tracking…
This is somewhat detailed, kindly read everything and then share any thoughtful comments, these are most welcome.
A few questions occur to me after watching one of Rob’ Braxman’s video a number of times.
He does cover the phone topic in many of his videos, this is one of the more recent ones.
“We are Being Tracked on the Internet Via Our Phone Number! Zero Anonymity 8-14-2024”
(We are Being Tracked on the Internet Via Our Phone Number! Zero Anonymity)
Generally, he has the idea to isolate phone numbers so that your “main” number does not have an online presence and you use a 2nd phone number for 2FA (2 Factor Authentication) purposes.
Background:
this paragraph is to outline some of my concerns, the actual questions are in the USE CASES below
If you have a number for 2FA purposes (accounts where you have an internet presence)
and the business enforces KYC (Know Your Customer), or you have to use a credit card (then your identity is known)
for example, banks, credit cards, hotels, online shopping etc.
What about other online sites that you do not have to use a credit card but requires a phone number?
For example telegram, signal, various online forums
Should that be the same 2FA number?
What is the risk in doing so?
Does telegram, signal, etc. accept Virtual Phone Numbers?
(I’ve heard a number of accounts only accept an actual Mobile (PTSN) phone number.
If I give my main telephone number to friends, family, and others with routine relationships, I can’t control what they might do with this number on their side.
Almost seems to me like I need a number for “trusted” relationships.
-
- *Have a look at my Use Cases and share comments.
I SEE AT LEAST FOUR USE CASES:
Phone setup:
degoogled phone (Pixel w Graphene OS)
1 Mobile number (PSTN: Public Switched Telephone Network) on SIM card
1 Mobile number on eSIM card
1 JMP (XMPP) phone number (https://jmp.chat/) - works with wifi, reverse tether to ethernet or data only SIM
2 profiles on the phone:
Owner – privacy focused apps
Alternate – sandboxed GApps (Google Apps) , Google Play Store, for apps that need this to run
USE CASE ONE:
Phone No. 01 - Not used for 2FA
Main Cell Phone No. (PSTN):
Phone approach for this number - use on the degoogled phone (Pixel w Graphene OS), main profile, no GApps (Google Apps) installed in this profile.
People I know or other routine relationships
For example: Friends, Family, businesses and organizations that I have a routine relationships
this includes doctors, dentists, car repairs, library, kids schools and other groups (soccer, music, swimming, baseball, dance, etc.)
There is a difficulty with this approach…
The intention is not to use this on the internet, but there are organizations that use your phone number for notifications, and often use that in an app. My kids are in several different activity groups, each use BAND.US, which uses one of my e-mails and phone numbers. The org can send mass text messages about schedule changes, etc. It does not seem practical to segregate contacts within this group, based on the risk of the number being “used” online.
QUESTION(S): What risks are there in this “pool” of contacts? Maybe is would be better to peel off the orgs that use Apps (like Band US) and put them on my 2FA number, and use them on the GApps profile, thoughts?
USE CASE TWO:
Phone No. 02 - Used for 2FA
2FA Cell Phone No. (PSTN) for businesses requiring KYC
Phone approach for this number - use on the degoogled phone, separate profile, has GApps (Google Apps) installed in this profile, Banks, Airlines, etc. So, this proifie is isolated from my main (owner) profile.
This is for businesses where your identity is fully known and you interact with these businesses regularly, Banks, Credit Cards, Rental Cars, Hotels, Airlines, etc.
QUESTION(S): Is this same number that I should use when communicating by phone with the Bank, Airline, etc.?
USE CASE TWO (ALTERNATE):
2FA Application (e.g. Ubikey) for business requiring KYC (and accept this approach)
Same as the above list
USE CASE THREE:
Other online forums, subscriptions, etc. typically require an e-mail address, and perhaps a phone number. Sites like Signal and Telegram require a phone number.
Often, the forum, merchant, etc. “sells” your info, resulting in unwanted spam. For me, this is gotten much worse over the years, lately I’m deleting many dozens of text messages daily. That number has got to go, but I’d like to have a solid approach before making changes.
*QUESTION(S): What’s the best practice, use the 2FA number? Or put them on another anonymous number? I may not want a direct connection between my 2FA number (where my identity is well known) and another forum like Telegram for example, to maintain some level of anonymity.
Rather than paying for a 3rd phone line, maybe use an additional JMP (XMPP) phone number (https://jmp.chat/) number, these a pretty cheap.*
USE CASE FOUR:
“Trusted” relationships.
Perhaps some family, friends, other contacts, who may get a “private” number that is NOT used for other routine relationships.
This could be a virtual phone or some other JMP (XMPP) phone number (https://jmp.chat/)
I believe if both parties are on XMPP, then their communications (calls, text) is E2EE (End to End Encrypted), also enables video calls.
These “trusted” relationships could be a subset of the contact names in the main phone number, mentioned above. I suppose they could get both numbers, or just get the “private” number.
comment:
there’s also online forums / chat room which don’t require an identity and could be used for more secure communications as needed
In Closing:
This is a bit wordy, but I think it reflects some common use cases when you have the intention to maintain some level for privacy online.
(unless you want to stay or revert to “normie” status where you use the same number for everything)
Thoughts?