Privacyguides and techlore resources doesn’t recommend fennec fdroid , is fennec not that trustworthy , can it replace mull ?
What does it have that other recommendations don’t have?
PGs preference is to recommend the top software in a category that are distinct from one another. If there is not distinct advantage, it’s not a strong enough competitor to add to the list. More recommendations is more risk, as recommendations can be revoked (which is a large negative for those who adopted it).
2 Likes
So no major issue , just about keeping the recommendations strong .
Non sequitor conclusion. I didn’t say it is trustworthy; I have no knowledge, and will let more educated members chime in. But to not be recommended does not imply it’s good or bad.
1 Like
I spent like 3 years co-maintaining it, it is fine, just largely vanilla Firefox compiled from source. relan, the maintainer, is also highly skilled and a long term foss contributor (eg. exfat-fuse).
6 Likes
Privacy Guides previously recommended against all Gecko-based browsers for Android as a result of this proposal. It looks like the current page doesn’t include the same anti-recommendation. Based on this recent thread it looks like sandboxing hasn’t improved much so I’m not sure why the Privacy Guides team removed the warning.
1 Like
Privacy Guides doesn’t have anti-recommendation (generally speaking) and Mull was recommended until it went unmaintained.
IronFox is a Mull fork, with better security and privacy than Fennec.
1 Like
Sometimes the best technical arguments aren’t enough to convince them and they do their thing anyway.
2 Likes
I’m gonna go with ironfox , thanks guys.
Chromium-based browsers would have been a much better choice.
It depends, I personally prefer Ironfox as daily driver, except for PWA.
I pick Brave for PWA though.
2 Likes
Depends on what?
Chromium-based browsers are many years ahead in terms of security on Android and I don’t see anything in Ironfox which outweighs this compared to Brave or Cromite.
1 Like
- uBlock Origin
- offline translations
- fully foss
- not supporting a monopoly
- safe browsing that works without play services or use of privacy invading enhanced mode
10 Likes
While these are all good things to have, I would rather prefer a browser with security which is adequate for 2025 and not being a decade behind in some important aspects.
I mean do users of Ironfox really support FF to combat this monopoly simply through their usage? Developing and maintaining browsers requires a lot of money and FF needs money to make their browser better. Ironfox users don’t bring any money to FF through their usage (e.g. no search engine deal or all the other things in FF, which FF uses to get money) and no money to websites which monetize themselves through ads, which could lead them to optimize their websites not only for Chromium, but also for FF. So they provide almost no incentives for FF to succeed. IMO it would be more effective if they simply donated money to FF.
1 Like
Increasing Firefox’s market share might help? I’ll occasionally find a website that’s broken on Firefox presumably because the market share was so small that the web developers don’t care to support it. This can worsen usability on Firefox (and forks like the Tor Browser, Mullvad Browser, etc.) which harms the viability of the browser overall.
But I agree, donating to the Mozilla Foundation probably has a larger impact than being a single user increasing their market share. (Not possible, you’d have to purchase Mozilla products such as: Mozilla VPN, Firefox Relay, Thunderbird Pro Services, and Pocket Premium.)
2 Likes
You forget users using Firefox, finding bugs and reporting them. Not to mention Ironfox often enables security/privacy enhancing techniques that Mozilla often rolls out slowly due to compat/performance issue (Fennec rolled-out local translations before Firefox, IronfFox enabled Fission while still only on Nightly). I don’t specifically about Ironfox, but at least Fennec (on which IF is based) does contribute upstream.
Also, Ironfox doesn’t ask for donations, so they aren’t taking away any money from Firefox.
Too bad this is impossible to do, since the Mozilla Corporation → Mozilla Foundation money pipeline is a one-way street.
Better off buying a Mozilla Corp product like VPN or Monitor, or donating to a different browser engine group like Ladybird or Servo if you want to actually support browser development.
6 Likes
Exactly, and for now Mozilla runs fine with Google money, although this is probably gonna be chopped in August.
1 Like
Mojjila is devloping thunderbird pro and thundermail , have to wait and see , how this is going yo work out.