To check a Linux ISO image integrity, is the sha256 sum better than PGP fingerprint, or vice-versa, and why ?
Thanks,
They serve different purposes: a SHA256 checksum only verifies the integrity of the file, while a PGP signature verifies both the integrity and authenticity (i.e. it is from the developer). Ideally, you should get the file and corresponding PGP fingerprint/checksum from two different places.
Once the system is installed, is it yet possible to ckeck the authenticity of the installation support from the system itself (and not from the USB stick) ?