jonah
February 13, 2023, 6:00pm
8
NoOne:
Well, (I don’t mean to be mean, same thing could happen to me) but you’ve missed it, even if Daniel Gray pulled up discussion where it already was solved. So making a category of “misfits” (or other name) could be reconsidered, IF it would save moderators more time to make such articles, than reopening old discussions, over, and over again.
(Related discussion for the team: https://github.com/privacyguides/team/discussions/18 )
I agree (though not strongly) that we should have anti-recommendations on the site for the reasons you specified, however @dngray disagrees and has some good reasons here:
This discussion is usually in our discussion forum, or on Github.
We don’t litter the site with every anti-recommendation, otherwise the whole site would become just that, and it would be painful to maintain as there are a lot of things, the team purposely does not use.
The reason this was removed, is because it was not entirely accurate. That being said we are still looking at re-introducing a Windows section Windows guide by IkelAtomig · Pull Request #1659 · privacyguides/privacyguides.org …
We’re not sure it’s worth the time investment. If you wish to continue discussing anti-recommendations, you can do so in that thread instead of here.
1 Like