Arkenfox will likely be EOL soon

Arkenfox will apparently be EOL at the next ESR build 153.

I have pinged @earthlng a couple of times in private in the last month for more diffs, but haven’t had a reply. I hope he’s alright :slight_smile:

This is numbered as version 144 because that’s the diff versions we got up to. I have managed to spot a few more changes since FF144 but it really requires a full diff to diagnose and catch everything.

For the record, I consider this project to be near EOL and was leaning towards v153 (the next ESR version) as being the last release - so here’s hoping we get more diffs from earthlng - if not, then this is most likely it

It seems it’s because Mullvad browser is adding persistent mode.

6 Likes

That’s very sad to hear. In light of the recent controversies surrounding Mullvad I’d rather stay away from their browser. I really hope someone will pick up arkenfox if the maintainer decides to step down.

4 Likes

Wow! When I first read that, I thought it might be another overblown reaction about a marketing misstep or whatever.

But, golly gee willikers, was I in for a shock!

6 Likes

Honestly the browser is not that problematic because it’s free.

So by using it you’re not giving Mullvad money or helping them.

3 Likes

I would guess it’s more effective at anti-fingerprinting, it’s main goal, if you’re using its VPN.

1 Like

Has it even really even been necessary for Firefox at this point a while now? Like how drastic of an improvement has it even been making? I do recall the Mullvad statement that they made, but I also thought they said something similar like, it’s getting to the point where it’s not really even needed on Firefox anymore.

1 Like

You are in fact by raising their download numbers and by other people seeing that you’re using it (which I bet will happen somewhere in your life).

5 Likes

Firefox still has a lot of user hostile defaults, some of which are not configurable via the graphical settings e.g. turning off all telemtry requires about:config AFAIK.

1 Like

It is beyond that, telemetry is removed via build options.

1 Like

I could be wrong but I don’t see them advertising the number of downloads. Even if they did, would that really be a deciding factor for users considering their VPN service?

If Mullvad Browser is going to be just as good as Arkenfox, I’d rather the contributors behind Arkenfox spend their time developing other useful tools instead. People who don’t want to promote Mullvad’s business can mention that they only recommend their browser but not their VPN.

2 Likes

may i ask what are the controversies surrounding Mullvad?

2 Likes

TL:DR the co-founder of Mullvad donated 5 million swedish krona to the ethnonationalist Örebro party. I suggest you refrain from discussing this here though as it will likely be removed as off topic.

5 Likes

yikes

4 Likes

One thing that bothers me about the Mullvad browser is that it is typically distributed in binary form by Mullvad, and isn’t part of the main repos of Debian/Arch/etc. I’d rather stick to software that is built and distributed by a process I can reasonably trust.

1 Like

Non-issue, Linux has always worked like that.

2 Likes

No, Linux doesn’t typically work like that. Packages in the official repositories are normally built from source by the distribution. The main exception is firmware and some proprietary drivers.

2 Likes

That introduces some concerns though like trusting an additional party, slower updates and upstream getting bug reports for unsupported distro packages. F-Droid is plagued by this too.

1 Like

Here we go, another thread bashing Mullvad. Enough already, let’s stay on topic and keep politics out.

3 Likes

It’s a shame, I was really starting to get attached to the Firefox UI. Would this presistent Mullvad browser support add ons for password managers? If not I think this will finally push me over to Brave Origin as a middle ground browser between privacy and ease of use for websites I regularly sign into.

2 Likes

Why not using Firefox then?

1 Like