No, but uBO also requires this permission.
Yes, but not uBO Lite.
I see
Thatâs strange. I only experienced this one or two times on Arch+KDE.
Any blockers, including uBOL, needs âinvasive permissionsâ to block more complicated ads and trackers. Non-permission mode, aka, âBasicâ mode is as it says: blocks basic things.
1 Like
Arc is establishing a bug bounty program, is âbolsteringâ their security team, has hired a new security engineer, and has âverified that no one outside of the security researcher who discovered the bug has exploited it.â
1 Like
To be fair to Arc here, they at least seem to be attempting to do something about it, and seemed to fix the vuln pretty quick. Not that I would recommend this browser. But nonthelessâŚ
1 Like
Translation: they probably have 2 security engineers now. Max.
3 Likes
Some better news, her bounty is increased to 20k.
1 Like
That is a lot better.
Itâs not just shiny UI. They provide a completely different feature set. Most useful for me are split view and âweb panelsâ which quickly opens a mobile version of a site in the browser sidebar.
I am not an expert, but I donât think these vulnerabilities apply to Floorp as it doesnât add any cloud-based features. As long as it pushes firefox security patches in a timely manner then that covers vulnerabilities that would actually be exploited in the wild because they target a large install base.