Hello,
I have a question about anonymous cryptocurrencies.
In France, there is a new anti-money laundering law that came into effect in June. This law states that the use of cryptocurrencies “with an integrated anonymization function” or the use of any means aimed at preventing the traceability of funds (mixers, multiple wallets) is now presumed to be money laundering related to criminal activities.
I would have liked to know if it is possible to obtain both a payment with relative anonymity AND plausible deniability. My threat model does not involve perfect anonymity (I do not need to resist a targeted investigation). However, I would like, if possible, to avoid operations which could be used against me under this law. So obtaining relative anonymity through ‘normal’ operations, or cryptos that are not as strongly associated with privacy as Monero or Zcash are.
I precise, if needed, that I only use low amounts in crypto.
As far as I know, it seems complicated, by definition, to prove the legal use of an anonymous cryptocurrency. At least, it seems impossible without losing a significant part of the benefit.
However, if you see a way to keep solid evidence (i.e., non-falsifiable) of the use I make of these cryptos, I am also interested.
I don’t know if I am very clear, if not, let me know and I will explain further.
Thank you very much for your help.