Which Flatpaks and other resources should be included in the "Downloads" section?

[jonah (Jonah Aragon)]

@username0990

I wondered why the exception was made for these two, as I see that one of them is in an experimental version on flatpak and the other is being maintained from an unverified account(s).

We are probably being inconsistent here, I think some contributors are adding as many downloads as they can find, while others are only adding downloads officially published by the developer.

I think whether or not a download is linked to on the developer’s own website is a good base criteria in this situation.