I appreciate your reply!
It’d be great if you could mention the browsers you use since Firefox and Chrome are the only two options I can see, other than of course the Chromium forks and Firefox forks.
This probably deserves another thread, but is this still the most reliable source?
Does PrivacyGuides recommend this:
Aren’t the users again divided among security levels (Standard, safer and safest)?
May be due to firefox sync issues.
being provided as a simple boolean toggle for process services by the OS
I’d just like to clarify setting this is far from simple, the services need to be explicitly developed with it in mind, and Mozilla did not do that from the start.
It is still absolutely bullshit that Mozilla has not cared to push forward Fission or isolatedProcess on Android for six years now.
cromite (its multi platform rn), becaue:
Yes, programs have to be designed with sandboxing in mind. It’s amazing that Android already had isolatedProcess for web content in Android 4.1. (2012!) and ridiculous that Mozilla didn’t get it done to develop a proper sandbox on by far the most used OS in the world for 12 years.
Desktop (Fedora):
Mullvad for general ephemeral browsing.
Firefox w/ uBo and Brave divide the rest of the workload, depending on what I’m logging into at the time.
Mobile (GrapheneOS):
Brave for forgetful browsing and per-site exceptions for logins
Occasionally I play with Mull or Vanadium, but they are not daily drivers.
Desktop:
Firefox, Brave and Mullvad.
Mobile:
Brave and Mull. Also installed cromite and mulch to check if there’s anything new in them.
Desktop: Brave and Librewolf
Mobile: Vanadium combined with AdGuard Android