systemd, the init system and service manager used by most major Linux distributions, has added a new birthDate field to the user records in the database in response to new age verification laws around the world, It's FOSS reports.
BTW, liberated systemd isn’t lagging behind in commits anymore.
I hope distros scrap this age thing entirely. Should we add a criteria around this ? Seems a distro mandating an ID (which to be clear isn’t what systems intends) to age-check shall not be recommended.
This title (“Systemd offers optional age verification”) is extremely dishonest (I hope unintentionally) and there’s not even the excuse that it’s from a source article, because It’s FOSS frames it correctly.
Systemd does not offer age verification in any form. They added a field to systemd-userdb to store a birthdate for an account. There is no functionality in systemd to verify this value or do anything with it. It’s just support in the schema for the data. It can be added with or without verification, but systemd doesn’t do any verification itself.
Also,
This change was not in the init system. It was in systemd-userdb, which is an entirely separate component not required to use the systemd init system.
Your comparison doesn’t even remotely make sense. The title isn’t “systemd offers optional age verification tools” (I think calling it a tool would still be a little misleading but I wouldn’t have anywhere near as much of a problem with that wording), it’s “systemd offers optional age verification”, as in, systemd will be performing the age verification.
If you said “Palantir offers mass killing” yeah that would 100% be false. That would mean Palantir kills people themselves, which they don’t.