Which can be done with any checking account at any bank.
Good point. But disposable cards offer security advantages too. If your card details get stolen it no longer matters.
Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that there is no standardized Account Name Inquiry in the US. Privacy.com does not need to avoid this check as it is not a check that is made.
Besides that not really being a privacy topic: my old opinion was shared here: Card masking tool - #4 by ph00lt0
Although itâs a matter of shifting trust, privacy.com can hide merchant information from your bank.
That is not possible with a disposable card from your bank, like Revolut.
And these days almost every bank has a similar service.
I canât find a single valid argument to recommend Revolut as a privacy service.
Visa, Mastercard and AMEX all offer it. Itâs not bank specific but card network. Itâs possible that privacy.com are allowed to return a result saying the check canât be made. And merchants can decide how to score this for fraud purposes.
I know that in some countries cards are linked to your ID card number as well as your name. and this does get checked. When using foreign cards you have to give a âfakeâ ID number that complies to the ID number format (usually using some kind of check digit). But when it is passed to the card issuer they give a response that says it is not needed for this card. And again the merchant can decide whether or not they want to process a transaction for a card with no linked ID number.
Privacy vs security issues aside. I generally prefer to not have to deal with a long drawn out charge back process for fraudulent transactions if I can avoid it. But yes, a different method of authenticating would be great.
If something has to be hidden from your bank. Why does it not have to be hidden from privacy.com?
From Financial Services - Privacy Guides
âMany banks and credit card providers offer native virtual card functionality. If you use one which provides this option already, you should use it over the following recommendations in most cases. That way, you are not trusting multiple parties with your personal information.â
so does revolut, as I stated
it means
after you add money from the bank to revolut, your bank wont see what youâre paying prior to except that you added money to revolut. But you are trusting revolut for your transactions and finance.
It is, but again youâre trusting revolut with the transactions, this canât be changed
The only thing my bank has is a virtual credit card but not a debit card or prepaid
fair enough but those are not points against it (except privacy concerns sure)
I agree, but here Iâm arguing about recommending Revolut as a privacy service.
Ok. But that quote was from the current Privacy Guides recommendation on this. So if youâre not recommending Revolut on that basis, then are you suggesting that Privacy.com and MySudo should also be removed?
Only if you use it as a secondary bank not if itâs your main bank. And also a very useless way to âhideâ transactions from a bank using another bank.
Primary or secondary, itâs similar with privacy.com, youâre hiding merchant info with privacy.com from your bank but you;re trusting the transactions you make with privacy.com, there is no difference whatsover.
revolut is the same or similar if better
letâs put it like that:
user very low threat model.
(will mark with and
if they see it or not, eye for they see it, X for they donât see it)
Revolut
user gets wage of 1000 euros from his/her bank 1
bank 1
revolut
user adds 20 euros to revolut
bank 1
revolut and processes it
user makes the transaction of 10 euros in a kiosk from revolut
Revolut
Bank
privacy.com
user gets wage of 1000 euros from his/her bank 1
bank 1
privacy.com
user makes the transaction of 10 euros in a kiosk from privacy.com
and also activating the hide details option
bank 1 the amount but
the merchant
privacy.com
If you are not comfortable with your bank knowing your purchase history privacy.com could have some usefulness, I guess.
Privacy.com is a privacy service, a bank is not.
Iâm not recommending Revolut on the basis that they rely on profiling and if itâs your main bank youâre not hiding any transactions.

âm not recommending Revolut on the basis that they rely on profiling and if itâs your main bank youâre not hiding any transactions.
Hence at the end of the say youâre trusting revolut with your transactions like youâre trusting privacy.com
what part of mine and @Catalyst2422âs explaination doesnât make sense?
The only difference is that you get profiled by revolut wanting to âhideâ transactions from your main bank.
With privacy.com the profiling is not happening.
I do not doubt that, trust me on that one, thatâs the reason I said youâre trusting the transaction(s) [and undoubtedly info but so is with privacy.com letâs face it] with revolut when you sign up, it is because of this, youâre trusting them not your bank at this point, hence my bold warning added and the privacy notice I added for another privacy concern.
In terms of hiding it in your Bank X (where X = Your Local Bank), both will do the job
However if you donât trust revolut on some basis it is very understandable and I can see why you should flock to privacy.com
, like duh, obviously.
but for us in the EU and Japan and more we unfortunately donât have the luxury of something like it which is a shame and hence a recommendation might be given. I was thinking of Revolut due to itâs one time card use and less limited virtual cards (wise only limits very few virtual cards meanwhile revolut can do more)
I also wanna give the occasional reminder to asses your threat model because of this
Did you read the privacy policy of Revolut? it is so atrocioooous
for sure it is worse than privacy.com
but I want you and everyone to riddle us EU, JP, AU etc. audiences with this
what other option do we have if we canât use privacy.com
except revolut and wise, hm?
solve the riddle, Iâll no joke give the riddle solver like a proton or tuta gift card of like up to 10-20 dollars or whatever if they solve that riddle. And Iâm confident itâs not possible to find one to place a bet publicly
I find it so bad that I just prefer to use my card (for online shopping I mean).