You haven’t done that at all. You’ve just said I’m right you’re wrong.
You have said we can’t know if 6 words is secure because there are missing variables. I have then outlined every variable required to answer the question and you have evaded it entirely. All you’ve done is said you know more than me and trust me bro.
You’ve said 10 words is secure, guaranteed by the laws of physics (ie. calculable mathematically) but it’s impossible to calculate if 6 words is secure. It’s not that hard, it’s literally how many guesses per second can be made divided by the possible combinations of the passphrase.
You’ve not laid out a position of any substance whatsoever.
To further highlight your inconsistencies, you’ve said previously in another post that 5-8 words of a diceware passphrase is strong enough.
So you’ve not actually done anything, in terms of disproving what I have said, or proving what are you saying. Get back to me when you’ve done the maths.