I am wondering if installing Trivalent outside of SecureBlue and losing SELinux confinement is still overall a better option then the other PG browser recommendations? Since users are not getting SELinux confinement outside of SecureBlue anyway, wouldn’t Trivalent still be the best option?
A post was merged into an existing topic: Brave vs Trivalent Security
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any help with getting Trivalent installed on Fedora 42? | 2 | 256 | September 12, 2025 | |
| Secureblue: Am I not supposed to use the Bitwarden addon? | 13 | 659 | September 30, 2025 | |
| Brave vs Trivalent Security | 67 | 5265 | November 17, 2025 | |
| Secureblue: Is This the Most Secure Linux Distro? | 77 | 7674 | October 6, 2025 | |
| Trivalent & Mullvad Browser: privacy comparison | 15 | 1496 | August 10, 2025 |
Massive organizations are monitoring your online activities. Privacy Guides is your central privacy and security resource to protect yourself online.
Privacy Guides is a non-profit, socially motivated website that provides information for protecting your data security and privacy.
We do not make money from recommending certain products, and we do not use affiliate links.