I’m traveling with both a US and EU passport from the US to Europe. Are there any points in the airport process where facial recognition is forced and I cannot opt out?
I’ve opted out of TSA and CBP entries in the US before, but I’m unsure about these two steps:
If there’s any other related issue I should be aware of, I’d appreciate the info.
You could use some laws—or one of them (if any exist)—to address your situation.
The thing is, it depends on you, the people you’re talking to, and that particular law, because some people will probably be demanding of you.
If your issue is just and very important, you should look for a viable solution to your situation. As for the cameras, I act as if they don’t exist for me.
An example based on real events (both physical and cyber):
In the years from 2020 onward, during that so-called false pandemic, we had to defend ourselves against this massive attack; it gave rise to activism, investigations, and even persecution…
We had to use those laws to defend ourselves against certain people who insisted that “vaccination” was necessary in order to work… the authorities did nothing.
That massive event has been a constant struggle; however, I remained calm in the midst of the storm.
What was learned:
1. The law does not protect you when you refuse to do something you don’t want to do. If you use it and it works, then it was worth it; otherwise, it wasn’t.
2. The authorities will not protect you when the situation is critical. They have orders from above not to do so.
3. You have to adapt and not be rigid—in other words, if the situation changes, don’t panic and find a way to take a different path. Continuous learning is required.
4. Infiltrations and divisions among people will arise. In a crisis, like that event, things are far too unpredictable.
5. Internet tools, such as a VPN, for example, won’t help you in that situation.
6. That event had already been warned about years ago by people who knew it was going to happen; it wasn’t fortune-telling—it was because it was being planned. “Not a conspiracy or a theory.”
-–
Did you understand what I just said? If you have any questions, please let me know.
Un ejemplo basado en hechos reales (tanto físico como cibernética):
En los años del 2020 en adelante, dicha falsa pandemia tuvimos que defendernos de este ataque masivo, surgió activismo, investigadores y hasta persecuciones…
Se tuvo que usar dichas leyes para defendernos contra ciertas personas que insistían de que era necesario “vacunación” con el fin de poder trabajar… dichas autoridades no hacían nada.
Ese evento de gran magnitud ha sido una lucha constante, sin embargo, yo estaba tranquilo en medio de la tormenta.
Lo que se aprendió:
1. Las leyes no te protegen cuando te niegas a rehusar lo que no quieres algo. Si lo usas y funciona, entonces, valió la pena, caso contrario, no.
2. Las autoridades no te protegerán cuando la situación es crítica. Tienen órdenes de arriba de no hacerlo.
3. Tienes que adaptarte y no ser estático, es decir, si la situación cambia, no te alarmes y busca la manera de buscar otra ruta. Se requiere aprendizaje continúo.
4. Surgirán infiltraciones y divisiones entre personas. En crisis, como en ese evento, es demasiado impredecible.
5. Las herramientas de internet como un VPN por ejemplo, no te va ayudar. En ese caso, contra la situación
6. Ese evento ya estaba alertado hace años atrás por personas que sabían que iba a ocurrir, no era adivinación, era porque estaba planeando. “No una conspiración ni teoría”.
-–
¿Se pudo comprender lo que acabo de decir?. Si surgen dudas, hacerlo saber.