I’ve translated all their speeches, and they’re changing positions to keep the boat from sinking. But the substance remains the same : they indirectly support the surveillance order (saying that regulation is needed on several occasions) and their position on the blog has nothing to do with their own words a few days ago.
Andy Yen was able to see my transcript and may write a right of reply soon. Don’t put the spotlight on Infomaniak’s response ; it clearly hides their game. They attack Proton repeatedly on the radio.
Having just read the transcript thanks for @_r3m8, the accusation of false information is a bold one. There are so many falsehoods in that transcript I am tempted to exercise our right of reply. https://x.com/andyyen/status/1932066617841877106
I have highlighted the most problematic arguments in my thread : https://x.com/_r3m8/status/1931775986145628443
The full transcription in french is available here : #### Tomas Jacobson responsable communication chez Infomaniak (RTS.ch)https: - Pastebin.com. I’d like to make it clear that I’ve written everything by hand to avoid any potential mistakes that an AI might make. Anyone who can translate this text is welcome to do so.