Hm. Maybe we should rethink our DNS provider recommendations? They were mainly chosen based on various technical security (like DNSSEC, DoH/DoT, etc.) and privacy (like QNAME minimization) measures, and global latency.
Not so much based on blocking functionality or account-level customization. I wonder if we should split our recommendations into good generic providers like Quad9 and good custom providers (basically Pi-hole alternatives) like NextDNS/ControlD, and include more information on the latter type of service.