I think I followed the instructions but no matter what I do, I still stuck with the issue that is reported and reproducible according to Futo.
Glad to hear that some are having success.
On Desktop they have great support. But yeah on mobile you have to add a special custom source that you code yourself or on random website.
Your attitude towards different opinions is inappropriate.
Do not continue with this line of posts.
how does grayjay compared to the other frontends? ie does it reveal your adress?
No YT frontends apps that we list hide IP. Thatâs why you should use a VPN.
Is the desktop version some sort of electron application? It feels like a web browser. if it is an electron application, it could have security issues, due to being based on outdated versions of chromium.
Also, if this application has any telemetry, does anyone know where in the source code it is so that I can make a version that removes it?
You can actually use it in your browser if you input a local IP adress of the app.
I do not understand this sentence. Please rephrase. If you mean that I can run it in, for example, Brave browser, please explain how this could be done.
Also, could @louis_rossmann elaborate on why Grayjay desktop is written in electron, if it is true that it is written in electron? Electron is believed to be insecure due to relying on out-of-date chromium versions. Please explain why it was not written in Rust instead.
Writing a GUI in rust is a much larger PITA than writing it in Electron
- Electron uses web technology which most are familiar with
- Electron is cross platform out of the box without dealing with native specific features
- Takes the least time to get a product out the door
In my opinion, the question could be rephrased as perhaps why a PWA wasnât used, or maybe a native compiling cross platform GUI framework (i.e. Qt). But the answer is to get a working MVP out the door to gauge interest and profitability.
From what has been said in this 2023 reddit post it seems that Grayjay does not block site trackers, is this still the case?
Closing: criteria change not planned.
So by far the best flagship Android frontend for a basically unlimited amount of sources because of their plugin system and that actually has full-time paid developers behind it, unlike any other frontend, isnât going to be listed because they wonât allow corporations to freeload in their license? Sigh.
Meanwhile, 1Password gets away with being completely proprietary when Proton Pass exists and Bitwarden has completely overhauled their clients.
what kinds of criteria do we even have for streaming apps? Grayjay is quite a bit more than a frontend for youtube alone. I think we should reconsider this. It is the best way to consume media on android imho.
It makes no sense to allow closed source code for something as sensitive as a password manager, and then reject a streaming frontend with source available code for not being fully FOSS
Yes! 2 years now watching YT, Peertube and Patreon content in a single app on Android. They even have their own cast feature to devices, which I love to use to avoid ads on YT video on my TV.
Pretty reliable, their Linux app still need some refinement, I donât recommend but that is another discussion.