While it’s possible to perceive bias in moderation, it’s crucial to recognize that moderators aim to uphold the community’s code of conduct. Note though, that EVERYONE has a bias, whether they like it or not, best one can do is be mindful of it and try to act on it. If you see anyone overstepping the Code of conduct, do call them out on it, its what it is there for.
Regarding tool discussions, whats written on the site is generally perceived as the truth, as it had to have been researched before it was added, the discussion from when it was added is in this case the source that is provided by default. If one wants to claim the site is wrong (and if that is the case, please do) then the burden of proving that it is wrong/should be changed is on the one making the claim.
Regarding the third claim, I wouldn’t say that the site is focused on the European mindset specifically, but I can see you point with it being focused on western countries. While our team members are spread across the globe, we are mostly based out of western countries, and as such it is only logic for us to have more knowledge on this subject from a western mindset/point of view. If you have a tip or idea of how we can improve this, I am all ears :).