Thanks, may be you have a point, but I highly doubt the conclusions you reach are apt given you’re not technical, by your own admission, to understand the discussion.
You’d notice that folks here, by default, rally around the moderators. Being an “antagonist” if you intend to question anything, is the default. Hopefully, you kind folks don’t lynch us “antagonists” for merely existing in spaces of our expertise.
Interesting choice of words. No, we aren’t a “competitor” (for reasons mentioned in the thread you claim you read).
So, it is “wait and see” for a “European” project, but “liar” & “dishonest” & “authoritative” for non-European ones? (see also the first message in this thread).
In my view, they violated at least one community guideline (despite being asked to tone it down):
- Trolling, insulting and/or derogatory comments, including personal or political attacks.
Daniel also did not reply to my DM, either.
Berserk? Force? Again, interesting choice of words. I’d like to see what made you think that. I am really curious. You can DM me. This topic isn’t for that.