TL;DR:
REUTERS: The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up the issue of whether art generated by artificial intelligence can be copyrighted under U.S. law, turning away a case involving a computer scientist from Missouri who was denied a copyright for a piece of visual art made by his AI system. […] Copyright was denied because art lacked a human creator.
In my opinion, this is welcomed news. I hope other countries preemptively pass laws to prevent AI art from being copyrighted. Especially when you consider that LLMs are trained on artists and people’s data without their consent.