# What's your opinion about this claim?

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/whats-your-opinion-about-this-claim/18535
**Category:** General
**Tags:** browsers
**Created:** 2024-05-26T16:27:25Z
**Posts:** 6

## Post 1 by @widget — 2024-05-26T16:27:25Z

What’s your opinion about this claim?

\*Duckduckgo  
[Comparing privacy across browsers and extensions](https://duckduckgo.com/compare-privacy)

\*Arkenfox recommends UBlock only.  
[Extensions](https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions)

 ![image](//forum-uploads.privacyguidesusercontent.com/original/2X/0/053d0ba316178aa60ab5d436037db91d90ed0a1f.jpeg)

---

## Post 2 by @xe3 — 2024-05-26T16:34:08Z

Looks like marketing material, not a series comparison.

DDG could be compared (and does look favorable) against Chrome and probably Safari. But comparing to adblocking extensions doesn’t really make much sense.

---

## Post 3 by @anon80779245 — 2024-05-26T17:14:07Z

It is also compared to other browsers.

---

## Post 4 by @anon63378630 — 2024-05-26T17:26:55Z

Say no to WebView browsers!

DDG Browser has zero actual fingerprinting resistance since it just uses the highly limited underlying OS WebView widgets.

---

## Post 6 by @anon63378630 — 2024-05-26T18:06:07Z

@anonymous176  
the fun part is that Brave and uBO have been doing CNAME uncloaking for like 4 years now.