Website [image] GitHub - secureblue/Trivalent: A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for... A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for desktop Linux inspired by Vanadium. Short description A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for deskto…

I don’t disagree. I am just trying to follow the previous precedent for when this happens. Anyway the discussion relevant to the criteria change can always be moved by @staff to a new thread where it can continue to thrive in a more on topic setting.

[image] Remove cross platform minimum requirement for desktop browsers toolboxSite Development Continuing discussion from the Trivalent suggestion thread , specifically from this reply . The question is should we remove this minimum requirement ? Must be avail…

[image] anonymous484: I think if PG is going to recommend SecureBlue or GrapheneOS, its only logical for PG to also recommend the browsers, otherwise it causes unnecessary confusion for users as to why PG is telling them to use something else. I think this is the compelling and most rational …

Maybe, but there also has to be a place to consider changing the criteria, and IMO that place might as well be here since it doesn’t make much sense to change the criteria except to allow a new recommendation. It’s not up to me what this gets marked as since I’m just a mod on the forum, not actuall…

[image] phnx: IMO that place might as well be here its really a question for @jonah - my understanding is that a criteria change requires its own discussion thread / evaluation and, that a tool suggestion that doesn’t meet the minimum criteria would be marked as rejected. [image] phnx: i…

[image] any1: You should now be able to use secureblue’s SELinux policy Thanks! I’ll try it out to see how it works. [image] any1: Trivalent does not use hardened_malloc Trivalent benefits from hardened_malloc being globally enabled in Secureblue, doesn’t it? https://secureblue.dev/fe…

There were complaints in the discussions about LibreWolf here, saying it can’t be recommended because the development team is too small and it’s a fork. I believe the same criticisms apply to Trivalent.

It’s mainly because Arkenfox exists and therefore there’s no need for Librewolf and update delays. In the case of Chromium, for obvious reasons, it has to be a Fork no matter what.

[image] any1: You should now be able to use secureblue’s SELinux policy . @anon51983832 I would not recommend installing a whole system policy RPM just for Trivalent confinement. Simply grab the selinux files for Trivalent from Secureblue’s GitHub repo and install it.

Privacy Guides Community

Trivalent (secureblue Web Browser)

Site Development Tool Suggestions

redoomed1 Split this topic March 16, 2026, 11:18pm 51

5 posts were split to a new topic: Plans to release minimal secureblue ISO?

Topic		Replies	Views
Recommended settings for Trivalent and Vanadium Guide Suggestions invalid	4	1122	May 6, 2025
Hardened-chromium is now Trivalent! General software	14	3557	April 11, 2025
Trivalent: security v. privacy Questions	11	1653	May 14, 2025
Brave vs Trivalent Security Questions	83	8019	February 11, 2026
Ungoogled Chromium Tool Suggestions rejected	13	2906	November 24, 2025

Privacy Guides

Massive organizations are monitoring your online activities. Privacy Guides is your central privacy and security resource to protect yourself online.

Privacy Guides is a non-profit, socially motivated website that provides information for protecting your data security and privacy.

We do not make money from recommending certain products, and we do not use affiliate links.

Knowledge Base

Private Web Browsers

Top VPN Providers

Privacy-Respecting Services

Software Recommendations

More Resources

Trivalent (secureblue Web Browser)

Related topics