Website [image] GitHub - secureblue/Trivalent: A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for... A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for desktop Linux inspired by Vanadium. Short description A security-focused, Chromium-based browser for deskto…

[image] anon57862721: I don’t think it is. But this is where I imagine we’ll disagree on how we’re looking at things in and about privacy. I am not saying privacy is or should be niche, but privacy products and services do serve a niche in the market. [image] anon57862721: Also, it’s not…

[image] anonymous484: I think if PG is going to recommend SecureBlue or GrapheneOS, If that’s the recommendation, then the default thinking and logic would dictate that the tools within it (at-least those that come by default) within the recommended OS are also recommended by extension as the…

From PG’s minimum requirements for desktop browser recommendations : Must be available on Linux, macOS, and Windows. As per the official Trivalent repo : Official support is only provided via secureblue Trivalent therefore fails to meet the minimum requirements for desktop browser recommendati…

[image] anon57862721: If that’s the recommendation, then the default thinking and logic would dictate that the tools within it (at-least those that come by default) within the recommended OS are also recommended by extension as they are a part of the OS with a fresh install. If that was the c…

Maybe instead of outright recommending it In the browser section, we put a notice in the place where we do recommend Secure blue which says that we recommend to use Trivalent if already on Secure Blue.

I added this caveat to the original post: [image] phnx: This would require removing the following arbitrary minimum requirement which does not relate to privacy or security: Must be available on Linux, macOS, and Windows.

I mean, with that logic, you should recommend and always explicitly mention each and every app that comes by default in the recommended OS in the recommended tools section. Do you want this? I don’t think the community here would want this like this. [image] anonymous484: If that was the case …

I think we have some sort of miscommunication going on here. I don’t think I fully understand your position. Are you suggesting that there is some sort of implicit recommendation already? I think PG has been explicitly against intentional implicit recommendations.

[image] anon57862721: I mean, with that logic, you should recommend and always explicitly mention each and every app that comes by default in the recommended OS in the recommended tools section. Do you want this? I don’t think the community here would want this like this. We already have thi…

I may be misunderstanding too. Let me think on it. Its late here and I’ll get back if I have anything more to say.

Privacy Guides Community

Trivalent (secureblue Web Browser)

Site Development Tool Suggestions

phnx December 9, 2025, 7:36pm 20

I added this caveat to the original post:

Remove cross platform minimum requirement for desktop browsers

Topic		Replies	Views
Recommended settings for Trivalent and Vanadium Guide Suggestions invalid	3	1344	May 6, 2025
Hardened-chromium is now Trivalent! General software	14	3785	April 11, 2025
Trivalent: security v. privacy Questions	11	1926	May 14, 2025
Brave vs Trivalent Security Questions	83	9045	February 11, 2026
Ungoogled Chromium Tool Suggestions rejected	13	3197	November 24, 2025

Privacy Guides

Massive organizations are monitoring your online activities. Privacy Guides is your central privacy and security resource to protect yourself online.

Privacy Guides is a non-profit, socially motivated website that provides information for protecting your data security and privacy.

We do not make money from recommending certain products, and we do not use affiliate links.

Knowledge Base

Private Web Browsers

Top VPN Providers

Privacy-Respecting Services

Software Recommendations

More Resources

Trivalent (secureblue Web Browser)

Related topics