# SearXNG enjoyers, how do you do it?

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/searxng-enjoyers-how-do-you-do-it/3462
**Category:** Questions
**Created:** 2022-10-20T16:47:19Z
**Posts:** 12
**Showing post:** 3 of 12

## Post 3 by @matchboxbananasynergy — 2022-10-20T17:06:36Z

> [@tome](#):
>
> Inevitably several of them will return errors, and when it gets annoying enough I switch instances.

This is why I _personally_ do not use SearX or SearXNG. That, and the fact that I would rather not trust random instance operators with my searches.

We recently had a discussion about removing it, but decided against it for now, for the reasons mentioned here:

> [@Remove SearXNG](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/remove-searxng/124/6):
>
> I don’t think we are interested in removing SearXNG at this time. There are plenty of advantages to using a search engine frontend like this that people might be interested in, including but not limited to: Aggregating search results from multiple providers gives you the most complete possible search results, some search engines are known to or are rumored to censor/demote various topics. Searx links directly to results, there’s no outbound link tracking to see exactly which result you visit. T…

That said, I don’t think there’s much to be done with regards to being rate limited, unfortunately.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/searxng-enjoyers-how-do-you-do-it/3462)._