# Proton opts for Zoom videoconferencing

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/proton-opts-for-zoom-videoconferencing/24569
**Category:** General
**Created:** 2025-02-01T11:58:45Z
**Posts:** 76
**Showing post:** 52 of 76

## Post 52 by @ignoramous — 2025-02-02T10:04:30Z

> [@ph00lt0](#):
>
> highly doubt it is that high in EU at least. 90% of the time people use Teams for me.

That is _one_ way of “back it up with numbers”, I see. Come on!

> [@jonah](#):
>
> privacy invasive product as-is from a third-party company that doesn’t care about security, I’m not sure what to tell you

I mean, app integration points cannot be remotely as privacy invasive as an OS (especially one that’s been repeatedly pwned), but aren’t we _not_ focusing on it because … reasons? [Configuring privacy settings in mainstream applications (e.g. WhatsApp) - #6 by jonah](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/configuring-privacy-settings-in-mainstream-applications-e-g-whatsapp/14969/6)

Proton is integrating with an industry leader. Just as how Firefox builds and runs on Windows, can run closed source plugins (including Zoom), but that doesn’t make their mission as a organisation, imo, less privacy-centered.[[1]](#footnote-78305-1)

Personally, this move looks like Proton is going mainstream, which usually means integrating with rest of the ecosystem.

> [@overdrawn98901](#):
>
> “well let’s just meet in person to keep it simpler”.

Jitsi is _actually_ super neat, especially for 1-on-1s. Unsure why it gets such a bad rep.

* * *

1. Enabling the integration point with Zoom by default, though, is a curious choice by Proton. [↩︎](#footnote-ref-78305-1)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/proton-opts-for-zoom-videoconferencing/24569)._
