I don’t want to know either, but it’s a must for me personally. If privacy is to be expected, it cannot just simply be reactionary.
It is like cutting the wires in a bathroom camera or turning it away from you – reacting to what already is (in this imaginary case we assume that bathrooms have cameras). We have to act rather than react – like having architectural designs in place where bathrooms don’t have cameras in the first place.
Coming back to reality: bathrooms don’t have systemically-placed cameras today, but you get the gist. The “technology” of the bathroom was built with privacy from the ground up. The same cannot be said with technology today.
That is what I fear about the future. Privacy diminishes as we build off of what already exists, and what already exists is privacy-invasive.
I feel as though we are missing some key discussion in the privacysphere upon which would lead to a massive non-reactionary change, and that prevents us from achieving what we want. But I don’t know what it is. I just feel it in my gut somewhere. Idk man, I’m high to be honest (though I hope that doesn’t lessen anything I’ve put forth).