Off-topic removed. If you think there’s an issue please report it to the moderation and don’t fight it out in public. Thank you.
6 Likes
No 
It has already been explained multiple times and is already in the documentation that is on their website. Go check if you want. If not. Then it isn’t worth your time.
Didn’t say they were. Just that they are secure and there is nothing wrong with their implementation. It is just a different way they are doing a password manager. Take it how you want.
There is nothing further for me to discuss. As, everything has been said.
Given OP is now gone (on request) i will just mark this as rejected for the forseeable future.
3 Likes
shouldnt we reject it for reasons more than op being gone??
Well OP was basically the only one arguing for it. But this is a good enough reason to reject it:
1 Like
Yes and those arguments are in this entire thread. If there are compelling reasons to reopen it for consideration we can always do that.
1 Like
Its just confusing since the primary reason for rejection should be what was argued for. No reason to state that it was because OP is no longer here to argue for it.
1 Like
That is the primary reason. Again if anyone has good counter arguments we can reopen it.
Well IMO it would be reasonable to leave open as a request otherwise because there was active discussion but now there’s literally no one asking for it. I personally don’t interpret it to mean it’s the only reason.
I agree, unless ofc there was enough reason established in the discussion to warrant it being rejected. Whether there is or isn’t enough reason, idk since i havent read the whole discussion (but fern/kissu says there is). Too long for me.. which is why i am against putting the reply below as the solution to this big thread
I wasn’t following this thread, so i initially interpreted it that way when it was rejected. Im glad its not the only reason, but i think it would still be confusing to anyone who just happens upon the thread.
OP was the only person debating that it should be added. Several users presented different points in opposition
Without OP, there are apparently 0 community members making the case for Passbolt
I think it makes sense to reject a tool with no advocates, with the understanding that it would get reopened if any future travelers decide it deserves another look
5 Likes
As @privacy.slouchy said, rejected suggestions aren’t permanently closed. If circumstances change in favour of a tool, its status can simply be changed. As of right now, OP arguing for Passbolt was the only point in favour.
If you can’t be bothered to read the freely available discussion then that’s on you.
2 Likes
I dont think thats why it should be explicitly marked as rejected. There’s lots of now inactive suggestions with no one supporting them, or making the case for them.
I see the connection u guys are making, dont get me wrong. I’m not playing dumb. I’m just saying it makes more sense to mark a suggestion as rejected for the reasons discussed throughout the discussion, and make it clear that that is the case.
it’s whatever though. I’m not gonna die on this hill to change this specific post’s solution.. Maybe i will instead open a new meta thread suggesting more transparency for why things are rejected/approved, and to provide a standardized structure to it or something.
If you are not reading what we are saying this is beyond pointless. It is closed because there is significant critisism that you did not bother to read. Given no one is given counter arguments it is rejected. I do not know how to make this more clear to you.
2 Likes
I never said my issue is with the fact that it is too long to read. If it was rejected because there was significant criticism, then okay. Sounds good to me, which I already said previously lol. But my gripe is with this if you want me to reiterate again and again:
Its clear to me, I just disagree in how to go about marking and explaining a rejection.. It’s called an opinion, of which I said I will maybe create a separate meta suggestion thread. If no one gives counter arguments, that’s fine and is a clear indication that the suggested tool isnt worthy of PG. But if it’s just because OP is gone, I don’t think that’s a reason. This doesn’t mean I think that this has happened in this specific thread..
If you want to discuss whether OP giving up on the post is the correct reason or not for rejecting Passbolt—read the thread. After that I’ll be more than happy to discuss your question, here on in a meta-thread.
Right now you’re just complaining without doing your due diligence first.
1 Like
true