# Lingva Translate

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/lingva-translate/12112
**Category:** Tool Suggestions
**Tags:** rejected
**Created:** 2023-03-20T05:58:06Z
**Posts:** 4
**Showing post:** 4 of 4

## Post 4 by @jonah — 2023-03-21T14:16:36Z

Marking this as rejected because the frontend criteria states these need to work without Javascript, and I see no reason to change that criteria if a non-JS alternative already exists:

> [@SimplyTranslate](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/simplytranslate/12125):
>
> I’m actually not in favor of suggesting [Lingva Translate](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/lingva-translate/12112). It doesn’t work at all without JavaScript 1 Translation Engine I recommend [SimplyTranslate](https://codeberg.org/SimpleWeb/SimplyTranslate-Web) works without JS supports multiple Translation Engines: Google, Deepl, Reverso , Iciba and Libretranslate [https://translate.bus-hit.me/](https://translate.bus-hit.me/)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/lingva-translate/12112)._