I agree with the basis of your argument (identitfy crisis etc.), and I want to add two things:
First, I also wouldn’t recommend LibreWolf to people who are bad at tech. I would recommend it to people who are intermediate or anything above technical, because those people can deal with broken websites. I don’t think, LibreWolf is for less technical users, I think much more that it is for convenient intermediate and anything above technical users.
Second, your argument is the reason why I don’t had any kind of argument in my arguments for adding LibreWolf to the Privacy Guides Browser Recommendations that says “LibreWolf should be recommended because it’s easy to use for less technical users“. I don’t think, LibreWolf is easy to use for less technical users and should be recommend for less technical users, but LibreWolf is definetely more convenient than FireFox and ArkenFox, and since the security fix delay seems not to be relevant (that’s the decision of the Privacy Guides-Team, and not mine) - and please note, it’s about the average time of security fix delay, not about that one example that @any1 mentioned several times - it should be recommended.