# Intel ME & hardware backdoor speculation

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/intel-me-hardware-backdoor-speculation/20776
**Category:** Guide Suggestions
**Created:** 2024-09-10T17:58:45Z
**Posts:** 12
**Showing post:** 9 of 12

## Post 9 by @dngray — 2024-12-19T12:48:28Z

I also wrote a rather lengthy reply about this in the _other thread_ seems there is one every 6 months.

> [@How can I have a computer without Intel ME?](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/how-can-i-have-a-computer-without-intel-me/14803/52):
>
> You have to assess the risk and benefit of having it before making a blanket statement that it is bad. It is one thing to say it can be implemented better. It is another thing to say that it is so bad the user should disable it and lose security features that are provided. If you’ve got Intel, [IME](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine) is what you get. If you don’t trust Intel, don’t buy an Intel. Would it be nice if it was open? Sure, but neither is AMD’s [PSP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Processor) which does [almost the same thing](https://dayzerosec.com/blog/2023/04/17/reversing-the-amd-secure-processor-psp.html). The reason we don’t hear much about it…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/intel-me-hardware-backdoor-speculation/20776)._