# FUTO Keyboard

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/futo-keyboard/18896
**Category:** Tool Suggestions
**Created:** 2024-06-14T12:41:20Z
**Posts:** 43
**Showing post:** 25 of 43

## Post 25 by @louis_rossmann — 2024-07-01T15:18:43Z

> [@HushedWave](#):
>
> I wonder if one could add a dead man’s switch to a license like this to try and remedy this. For instance:
> 
> 1. If the license is changed in the future, all previous iterations of the source code become one of the standard Open Source licenses.
> 2. If the source becomes unmaintained for X amount of time, the source code become one of the standard Open Source licenses.
> 
> I don’t know if that would still accomplish FUTO’s goals in particular, but I like this discussion because I tend to agree with their general concerns - but also preferring more pure open source philosophy.

It is on the roadmap to come up with something like a rugpull clause, where if certain metrics are met, you can just do whatever you want to it. It’s more difficult to put this in legalese. Especially when you’re in a building of people who just want to program all day.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/futo-keyboard/18896)._