# Ente: Our Rust crypto was reviewed. The real find was the auditor

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/ente-our-rust-crypto-was-reviewed-the-real-find-was-the-auditor/36843
**Category:** News
**Tags:** article
**Created:** 2026-04-04T09:26:14Z
**Posts:** 9
**Showing post:** 7 of 9

## Post 7 by @ignoramous — 2026-04-04T19:10:07Z

> [@hakavlad](#):
>
> think that the best LLMs don’t have this knowledge?

LLMs are limited both by what they’ve already seen (training set), and the inference (prompts/input).

I suspect the question you want to ask is: Is the expert (“human in the loop” as @bitsondatadev puts it) responsible for reviewing LLM’s output putting in the requisite work to evaluate it for correctness and completeness?

> [@sha123](#):
>
> Is this a joke?

SoTA LLMs from frontier labs are really, really good at code. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are decent at code-focused cryptography audits, too. I can tell from experience that LLMs in the hands of an expert will produce vastly different & potentially highly useful results than a “script kiddie” might. In short, it all depends on just who is wielding the ~~sword~~ prompt.

All that said, rage-bait marketing ([ex](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/proton-ag-asking-standard-notes-founder-to-stop-a-new-project-worth-discussing/34532/61)) is also a thing these days…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/ente-our-rust-crypto-was-reviewed-the-real-find-was-the-auditor/36843)._