It really isn’t. It’s essential end-secure_node(decrypts),secure_node(encrypts)-other end.
I think there was an attack on servers recently using physical means. Really weird they say it’s end-to-end encrypted.
It really isn’t. It’s essential end-secure_node(decrypts),secure_node(encrypts)-other end.
I think there was an attack on servers recently using physical means. Really weird they say it’s end-to-end encrypted.
Until then, it’d be good just to get what you can ask an LLM. In practice, I could talk about pretty much anything with anyone. 99.9% wouldn’t get it, or if they did, they couldn’t care less. You shouldn’t give it any personal or secret info. You should let it do the work of 10 people in 30 minutes. I’m not at all surprised that a huge number of jobs are going to disappear. Customer service, all the paper-pushers, all the people processing applications. It sucks for a lot of people, but it’s true. I’m just surprised the transition is taking this long.
And then once we get E2EE and enough power, the banking and legal sectors are definitely next. Of course, a human will review and make the final call.
I just want to advise to take (the success ad sustainability of) these jobs losses with a grain of salt. In fact there’s evidence that most of these AI-onboarding decisions (usually built on hype) are decreasing efficiency not increasing it and is requiring a lot of “firefighting”. I totally forgot which companies’ were reporting this I read this report like a couple days ago. If I find I’ll post here. Gary Marcus is a source I recommend for keeping a balanced and skeptical head in the face of all the AI hype boom and doom.
Well, accomplishing all of that is quite straightforward, considering I can leverage it in a job that’s ten times more complex. The real issue is a shortage of skilled individuals; the rest are simply afraid for their job security. This situation, however, presents a wealth of opportunities for proactive people to figure out how all these processes can be automated. One shouldn’t resist artificial intelligence until the bitter end, especially since it has already taken the world by storm. Of course, you’re free to resist, but it would be prudent to seriously consider whether your own job could be performed by AI.
I understand but I’m saying there’s compelling evidence to show that replacing humans with AI is not proving to be a good idea and not returning expected hyped results but the opposite. It’s not sustainable, and the firefighting costs make it not worth it. I’m just saying, CEO’s and Hiring Managers shouldn’t jump on bandwagons just yet without really being objective and not influenced by all the bubbly hype.
This is precisely a consequence of its improper utilization or application in unsuitable contexts. Klarna has acted correctly and redirected people to the appropriate channels. They’ve had the audacity to experiment, and upon realizing it was the wrong approach, they’ve reverted people back.
Furthermore, my professional self and my private self are kept distinctly separate. And in fact, the reason I discovered this forum was that I was searching for tools to achieve encryption and security, as I was already paranoid about everything—and justifiably so, given the need to protect myself from so many threats. Now, I sleep peacefully at night.