# Concerning Development in Clearview AI Court Case

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/concerning-development-in-clearview-ai-court-case/18879
**Category:** General
**Tags:** article
**Created:** 2024-06-14T02:40:03Z
**Posts:** 7

## Post 1 by @exaCORE — 2024-06-14T02:40:03Z

> **[Clearview AI Used Your Face. Now You May Get a Stake in the Company....](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/business/clearview-ai-facial-recognition-settlement.html)**
>
> The facial recognition start-up doesn’t have the funds to settle a class-action lawsuit, so lawyers are proposing equity for those whose faces were scraped from the internet.

Also please don’t tell me that there’s a paywall. I know. I’m sure this tech-savvy group of people can find a way to bypass it and/or ignore this post.

---

## Post 2 by @anon21666177 — 2024-06-14T03:37:26Z

The stake in the company isn’t enough since in the future that stake may be diluted. Also, when one person sells their stock, each class member’s shares may lose value so individuals selling their shares would get variable amounts as a settlement. Most of all, the value of stolen data here exceeds the value of clearview itself. The company should’ve seen an insurmountable debt from this given they’re worth under $300m and the US itself has over 300m people.

---

## Post 3 by @exaCORE — 2024-06-14T07:24:44Z

But even the concept of giving victims stake in the company is concerning. As stated in the article:

> “Now you have people who are injured by Clearview trampling on their privacy rights becoming financially interested in Clearview finding new ways to trample them,” he said.
> 
> Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a privacy advocacy organization, was also critical.
> 
> “If mass surveillance is harmful, the remedy should be stopping them from doing that, not paying pennies to the people who are harmed,” Ms. Greer said.

---

## Post 4 by @anon21666177 — 2024-06-14T07:28:14Z

Yeah, it’s sad they got away with it. The US is becoming a data harvesting hub thanks to unregulated use of AI. Europe tries to do better but we’ll see if their AI bill pans out.

---

## Post 5 by @reterkha — 2024-06-14T07:43:39Z

Sometimes turning off JavaScript allows you to bypass paywalls.

Edit: Doesn’t work this time.

---

## Post 6 by @KevPham — 2025-10-28T17:43:05Z

> **[Criminal complaint against facial recognition company Clearview AI](https://noyb.eu/en/criminal-complaint-against-facial-recognition-company-clearview-ai)**
>
> Clearview AI is known for scraping billions of photos of people around the world on the internet – and selling its facial recognition system to law enforcement and state actors

Noyb is now suing them with a criminal complaint. Meaning, the executives might actually get jail time :joy:

> However, EU law is not limited to administrative fines under the GDPR. Article 84 GDPR also allows EU Member States to foresee criminal sanctions for GDPR breaches. Austria has implemented such a criminal provision for certain GDPR violations in [§ 63 of its national Data Protection Act](https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10001597&Artikel=2&Paragraf=63&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= "https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10001597&Artikel=2&Paragraf=63&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht="). In contrast to GDPR violations, criminal violations also allow actions to be taken against managers and to use the full range of criminal procedures, including EU-wide actions. For that reason, _noyb_ now filed a criminal complaint with the public prosecutors in Austria. If successful, Clearview AI and its executives could face jail time and be held personally liable, in particular if traveling to Europe.

---

## Post 7 by @Blackbird — 2025-10-28T17:55:50Z

There’s something good about the EU after all!

edit. “could face jail time and be held personally liable, in particular if traveling to Europe”