# CoMaps (FOSS Navigation, Organic Maps fork)

**URL:** https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/comaps-foss-navigation-organic-maps-fork/29557
**Category:** Tool Suggestions
**Created:** 2025-07-29T13:11:56Z
**Posts:** 175
**Showing post:** 34 of 175

## Post 34 by @TheDoc — 2025-08-27T02:05:21Z

> [@anonymous378](#):
>
> I guess I don’t really see how that changes @phnx point.

Aside from forming a legal entity (which is a work-in-progress) how else could they be more community driven?

> [@anonymous378](#):
>
> I don’t think its a matter of putting a finite time on it. The track record hasn’t changed much in a month. It’s going to take time to build a resume.

I guess what I meant is regardless of how we calculate it, their reputation or maturity doesn’t need to be nearly as well-proven [as browsers for example](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/ironfox-a-new-mull-fork/23638/100). I think it’d be overkill and counterproductive for us to wait an extended period of time for them to re-prove a reputation they’ve already earned by being Organic Maps contributors who jumped ship over to an objectively more open and transparent alternative that has been going strong for months ever since its inception.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/comaps-foss-navigation-organic-maps-fork/29557)._
